![Comparison of single- and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Journal of Perinatology Comparison of single- and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Journal of Perinatology](https://media.springernature.com/m685/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41372-017-0005-7/MediaObjects/41372_2017_5_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
Comparison of single- and double-balloon catheters for labor induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials | Journal of Perinatology
![EBB 153 - Pros and Cons of the Foley and Dilapan-S® for Cervical Ripening During an Induction - Evidence Based Birth® EBB 153 - Pros and Cons of the Foley and Dilapan-S® for Cervical Ripening During an Induction - Evidence Based Birth®](https://evidencebasedbirth.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/EBB153_Podcast-Blog-Banner.png)
EBB 153 - Pros and Cons of the Foley and Dilapan-S® for Cervical Ripening During an Induction - Evidence Based Birth®
![Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Full Text Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Full Text](https://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12884-019-2491-4/MediaObjects/12884_2019_2491_Fig1_HTML.png)
Double- versus single-balloon catheters for labour induction and cervical ripening: a meta-analysis | BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Full Text
![Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI Collaborative): an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - The Lancet Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI Collaborative): an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - The Lancet](https://www.thelancet.com/cms/asset/afc9b13d-4d49-42d1-86d1-f45062bedec1/gr1.jpg)
Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI Collaborative): an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials - The Lancet
Comparison of Time to Delivery With and Without Cervical Ripening Balloon Catheter for Induction of Labor
Double balloon catheter for induction of labour in Chinese women with previous caesarean section: one-year experience and litera
Video abstract on Foley catheter vs oral misoprostol for induction of labor | New #UOGJournal video abstract on an individual participant data meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and safety of Foley catheter and
![Cureus | Intra-cervical Foley Balloon Catheter Versus Prostaglandins for the Induction of Labour: A Literature Review | Article Cureus | Intra-cervical Foley Balloon Catheter Versus Prostaglandins for the Induction of Labour: A Literature Review | Article](https://assets.cureus.com/uploads/figure/file/537080/lightbox_2e693100933c11ed9ec4f57e15eb3bd1-article_river_06e4a8508d1d11edb60309715c101763-ok.png)
Cureus | Intra-cervical Foley Balloon Catheter Versus Prostaglandins for the Induction of Labour: A Literature Review | Article
![JCM | Free Full-Text | Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO) JCM | Free Full-Text | Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)](https://www.mdpi.com/jcm/jcm-11-01525/article_deploy/html/images/jcm-11-01525-g001.png)